Supreme Court Seal
Supreme Court Seal
South Carolina
Judicial Branch
Supreme Court Archived Videos

Wednesday, March 11, 2020

2018-001878 - The State v. Sha'quille Washington

The Court granted a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals decision in State v. Washington, 424 S.C. 374, 818 S.E.2d 459 (Ct. App. 2018).

2019-001604 - The State v. Tony L. Kinard

The Court granted the State a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' interpretation of S.C. Code Ann. ยง 56-5-2953(A) (2018) in State v. Kinard, 427 S.C. 367, 831 S.E.2d 138 (Ct. App. 2019).

2019-000842 - The State v. John Kenneth Massey, Jr.

The Court granted the State's petition for a writ of certiorari to review the decision of the court of appeals in State v. Massey, 426 S.C. 90, 825 S.E.2d 717 (Ct. App. 2019). The issue on appeal concerns the interpretation of S.C. Code Ann. section 16-11-10, which defines the term "dwelling" for purposes of South Carolina's first-degree burglary statute.

Wednesday, February 12, 2020

2019-000670 - Rent-A-Center East v. SCDOR

The Court granted a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals decision in Rent-A-Center East, Inc. v. S.C. Dep't of Revenue, 425 S.C. 582, 824 S.E.2d 217 (Ct. App. 2019).

2019-001373 - Tower Street Capital Management Inc. v. KnightBrook Insurance Company

Pursuant to Rule 244 of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules, the Court will answer the following questions certified by the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina: (1) Under South Carolina law, when a contract's durational term is keyed to the occurrence of a future, specific event, must the future, specific event be an objective event such that one party to the contract does not have control over it? and (2) If the answer to Question (1) is yes, does a contract that requires the two parties to the contract to form a corporation together in the future in order to terminate the contract qualify as an objective event that renders the contract sufficiently definite in duration such that it is not perpetual and thus not terminable at will?

2019-000467 - The State v. Robin Herndon

The Court granted a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in State v. Herndon, Op. No. 2018-UP-458 (S.C. Ct. App. filed Dec. 12, 2018).

Tuesday, February 11, 2020

2019-000920 - Don Weaver v. Recreation District

The issue presented on appeal is whether the circuit court erred in rejecting Appellant's argument that section 6-11-271 of the South Carolina Code, concerning millage levied for special purpose districts, is unconstitutional.

2019-000238 - Ex Parte: Builders Mutual (In Re: Palmetto Pointe v. Island Pointe)

The Court considers the trial court's denial of an insurer's motion to intervene in a construction defect suit.

2019-000843 - Michael Landry v. Angela Landry

We granted Michael Landry's petition for a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision affirming the family court's denial of relief under Rule 60, SCRCP.

Wednesday, January 15, 2020

2018-001926 - William Crenshaw v. Erskine College

We granted certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision reversing the trial court's order granting Erskine College's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict.

2018-001042 - The State v. Arthur M. Field

The Court granted a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals decision in State v. Field, Op. No. 2017-UP-455 (S.C. Ct. App. filed Apr. 4, 2018).

2018-002035 - The State v. Archie M. Hardin

Archie More Hardin was convicted of armed robbery, assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature, possession of a weapon during the commission of a violent crime, and three counts of kidnapping. The court of appeals affirmed his convictions. State v. Hardin, 425 S.C. 1, 819 S.E.2d 177 (Ct. App. 2018). The Court granted the State of South Carolina a writ of certiorari. The State agrees with the court of appeals' disposition in the case; however, the State argues the court of appeals erred in analyzing one of the three issues Hardin raised on appeal: whether the trial court erred in admitting out-of-court identifications.

Tuesday, January 14, 2020

2018-001355 - The State v. Nakia Johnson

The Court granted Nakia Johnson's petition for a writ of certiorari to review whether the court of appeals erred in finding the trial court's refusal to grant a mistrial after the child advocacy interviewer testified he instructed Victim to tell the truth during the forensic interview amounted to harmless error, thereby affirming Johnson's conviction for second-degree criminal sexual conduct with a minor.

2019-000500 - The State v. Suzanna Simpson

Suzanna Brown Simpson was convicted of two counts of murder, one count of attempted murder, and possession of a weapon during the commission of a violent crime. The trial court sentenced Simpson to two consecutive life sentences for the murders, a consecutive term of thirty years' imprisonment for the attempted murder, and a consecutive term of five years' imprisonment for the weapon charge. The court of appeals affirmed. State v. Simpson, 425 S.C. 522, 823 S.E.2d 229 (Ct. App. 2019). This Court granted Simpson's petition for a writ of certiorari to determine whether the trial court erred in excluding testimony from Simpson's expert witness.

2018-001874 - Century Capital v. Midtown Development

The Court granted a writ of certiorari to review the court of appeals' decision in Century Capital Group, LLC v. Midtown Development Group, LLC, Op. No. 2018-UP-249 (S.C. Ct. App. filed June 13, 2018).

Select Year: