S.E. 2d
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court
In the Matter of Mykel
Hitselberger, Respondent.
Opinion No. 24967
Submitted June 29, 1999 - Filed July 12, 1999
INDEFINITE SUSPENSION
Mykel Hitselberger, pro se.
Henry B. Richardson, Jr., for the Office of the
Disciplinary Counsel.
PER CURIAM: By order dated December 2, 1998, respondent
was indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in the State of Maryland.
A letter from the Clerk of this Court, dated May 20, 1999, notifying
respondent that he had thirty (30) days in which to inform this Court of any
reason the imposition of the identical discipline should not be imposed on
respondent in this state was sent to respondent at his last two known
addresses. See Rule 29(b), RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR. Both letters were
returned, one because the forwarding address had expired and the other
because the letter was unclaimed. The Court has not otherwise received a
response from respondent. Finding a sufficient attempt has been made to
serve notice on respondent, and finding none of the factors in Rule 29(d),
RLDE, Rule 413, SCACR, present in this matter, we hereby suspend
respondent indefinitely from the practice of law in this state. Within fifteen
(15) days of the date of this opinion, respondent shall file an affidavit with
p.17
IN THE MATTER OF HITSELBERGER
the Clerk of Court showing that he has complied with Rule 30, RLDE, Rule
413, SCACR.
INDEFINITE SUSPENSION.
p.18